COMPASS, Employment Pass Reform, and the Rise of “Strategic Immigration Planning”
Over the past decade, Singapore has gradually redefined its approach to employment-based immigration, moving away from discretionary decision-making toward rule-based, transparent selectivity. The centerpiece of this transformation is COMPASS (Complementarity Assessment Framework) — a points-based system now firmly embedded into the Employment Pass (EP) regime. “COMPASS rewards preparation and punishes assumptions. The strongest applications are not those with the highest salaries, but those that clearly explain why the business needs this role, how the candidate adds value, and how the company invests in the local workforce. Singapore hasn’t closed its doors — it has raised the standard of entry.” Introduced to balance economic openness with domestic workforce protection, COMPASS requires applicants to score at least 40 points across multiple criteria, including salary benchmarking, qualifications, skills relevance, firm diversity, and support for the local workforce. The system reflects a broader shift: foreign talent is still welcome, but only if it demonstrably complements Singapore’s long-term economic strategy. One of the most persistent misconceptions among employers is the belief that salary alone guarantees approval. While compensation remains a critical factor, COMPASS explicitly penalizes applications that lack strategic coherence. Authorities assess: Whether the role genuinely requires foreign expertise Whether the company has balanced local hiring Whether the job scope aligns with industry needs Whether the applicant strengthens sectoral competitiveness As a result, high-paying but poorly justified roles are increasingly refused, while well-structured applications from mid-sized firms with clear workforce strategies succeed. COMPASS has made Singapore’s immigration system more predictable, but also less forgiving. Marginal cases no longer benefit from discretion. Documentation gaps, inconsistent job descriptions, or unclear reporting lines can result in rejection, even when an applicant appears qualified on paper. This evolution has elevated the role of immigration lawyers from form-preparers to strategic advisors, working alongside HR, finance, and executive leadership to align immigration strategy with corporate planning. Singapore’s model is increasingly cited across Asia-Pacific as a blueprint for managing skilled migration without political volatility. Unlike systems driven by election cycles, COMPASS functions administratively — insulated from populist swings but highly exacting in execution. For professionals relocating from Europe, the US, or neighboring Asian states, the key shift is this: eligibility is no longer binary — it is cumulative and contextual. Expert Comment — Alona Shevtsova, Immigration Lawyer
Beyond Salary: Why Many Employers Still Get It Wrong
Legal Predictability — With Higher Stakes
Regional Implications for Asia-Pacific Mobility
