US Senate Democrats to propose sanctions over E1 project in West Bank — Jerusalem Post
A group of Democrats in the US Senate plans to introduce a bill on Wednesday imposing sanctions on individuals and entities involved in implementing Israel’s E1 settlement project in the West Bank. The Jerusalem Post reported this, citing the text of the document reviewed by Reuters.
Who could be covered by the sanctions
The bill provides for sanctions against foreign companies, individuals and other entities that the US Treasury Department determines are responsible for, or involved in, the construction of Israeli settlements or related structures in the E1 area. The restrictions could also be applied to those submitting bids for E1 tenders.
Separately, the document proposes sanctioning individuals and organizations that seek to organize, direct, finance or otherwise facilitate the relocation of Israeli civilians to settlements in the E1 area.
Authors of the initiative and context
The lead sponsors of the bill are Democratic Senators Chris Coons of Delaware, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Ron Wyden of Oregon and Ruben Gallego of Arizona. The document has at least ten co-sponsors, all of whom are Democrats.
More current news is available on the UA.News Telegram channel Telegram.
The initiative is another manifestation of disagreements between Democrats in Congress and the Israeli government over policy in the West Bank. Democratic US lawmakers have also called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to curb settler violence and mass detentions of Palestinians by Israeli security forces.
The E1 project
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced approval of the E1 project in August 2025. According to the source, the project could divide the West Bank and cut it off from East Jerusalem.
Western capitals and civil society organizations oppose the plan over concerns that it could undermine prospects for a two-state solution. Most of the international community considers Israeli settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law, while Israel disputes this, citing historical and biblical ties to the territory as well as security considerations.
